Statement Analysis gets to the truth.
Although I have doubts as to what Amanda Knox's actual role was, by Statement Analysis, she placed herself at the crime scene and took ownership of involvement.
The latter makes her guilty in concert.
Statement Analysis recognizes that pronouns are instinctive, exempt from the personal, internal subject dictionary of each subject. The pronoun "my" is said to indicate up to 80% of all murders.
Objection: Amanda Knox was coerced into a confession
Answer: Statement Analysis studies of POW confessions shows two things:
1. Deception within a false confession
2. Absence of "we" against the Stockholm Syndrome
1. Even within a coerced confession, Statement Analysis still shows deception and the false confession as the false confession will show a lack of experiential memory in the language. The same principles of analysis apply to false confessions.
2. Former POWs in their statements regarding their captives do not use the pronoun "we."
"We" indicates cooperation and unity. For the former POW, there is no "we" when it comes to their former captives because there is no unity between them.
Even Amanda Knox's email and interview, after conviction, have linguistic indicators of deception.
Statement Analysis shows: She was present for the murder and was involved in the assault.
Have you noticed the one thing missing over the years in all of Amanda's statements?
She doesn't say "I didn't do it" in open statements.
MILAN, Italy -- A newly released report could be harmful to Amanda Knox's appeal of her conviction for the murder of her roommate.
The document, obtained by SeattlePi.Com, was issued by Italian appeals court judges. It says Knox had a conversation with her parents while under surveillance in prison in which she said "I was there," allegedly referring to the night of the murder, according to Seattlepi.com.
The document doesn’t deal specifically with Knox’s case—it’s a sentencing report that explains why Rudy Guede was convicted of Meredith Kercher’s murder. Guede was the first person convicted for the murder of Kercher in 2007, but the sentencing report concludes he didn’t act alone. It was released by the highest Italian appeals court, which is considering Guede’s latest appeal.
It’s not the first time the “I was there,” comment has made headlines, suggesting that Knox incriminated herself during that prison conversation. Before Knox’s conviction, her parents said Amanda was referring to Raffaele’s apartment when she was overheard telling them “It would be stupid to lie about this because I know I was there.”
Knox explained the remark in the summer of 2009 when she testified in her murder trial. Knox said that she was at Raffaele’s apartment and wouldn’t lie about it . Asked Tuesday about the newly released judge’s report, a spokesman for the Knox family said “Amanda’s testimony speaks for itself.”
Statement Analysis concludes that Amanda Knox' own words place her at the crime scene and show ownership of involvement.
We have read about prosecutorial misconduct, poor investigatory skills, and lots of unfair treatment by the European press, and in spite of all these things:
Amanda Knox's own words speak for her and tell us what we need to know.
Statement Analysis gets to the truth.
The sentencing report on Guede isn’t all bad news. It says that Guede was not credible and that his stories were “full of inconsistencies,” according to SeattlePI.com. Guede waited five months before placing Knox at the murder scene.
Knox and ex-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito were convicted in December 2009 of sexually assaulting and murdering Kercher in the central Italian city of Perugia. Knox was sentenced to 26 years in prison; Sollecito 25 years. Both deny wrongdoing and their appeals trial is under way.
The next appeal hearing is set for March 12.
Guede opted for a fast track trial, which was closed to the public, and was sentenced to 30 years in prison. His sentence was reduced to 16 years on appeal. He’s appealing again, hoping to have his sentenced shortened further.Source URL: http://ghubar-magazine.blogspot.com/2011/10/amanda-knox.html
Visit ghubar magazine for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Although I have doubts as to what Amanda Knox's actual role was, by Statement Analysis, she placed herself at the crime scene and took ownership of involvement.
The latter makes her guilty in concert.
Statement Analysis recognizes that pronouns are instinctive, exempt from the personal, internal subject dictionary of each subject. The pronoun "my" is said to indicate up to 80% of all murders.
Objection: Amanda Knox was coerced into a confession
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
amanda knox
Answer: Statement Analysis studies of POW confessions shows two things:
1. Deception within a false confession
2. Absence of "we" against the Stockholm Syndrome
1. Even within a coerced confession, Statement Analysis still shows deception and the false confession as the false confession will show a lack of experiential memory in the language. The same principles of analysis apply to false confessions.
2. Former POWs in their statements regarding their captives do not use the pronoun "we."
"We" indicates cooperation and unity. For the former POW, there is no "we" when it comes to their former captives because there is no unity between them.
Even Amanda Knox's email and interview, after conviction, have linguistic indicators of deception.
Statement Analysis shows: She was present for the murder and was involved in the assault.
Have you noticed the one thing missing over the years in all of Amanda's statements?
She doesn't say "I didn't do it" in open statements.
MILAN, Italy -- A newly released report could be harmful to Amanda Knox's appeal of her conviction for the murder of her roommate.
The document, obtained by SeattlePi.Com, was issued by Italian appeals court judges. It says Knox had a conversation with her parents while under surveillance in prison in which she said "I was there," allegedly referring to the night of the murder, according to Seattlepi.com.
The document doesn’t deal specifically with Knox’s case—it’s a sentencing report that explains why Rudy Guede was convicted of Meredith Kercher’s murder. Guede was the first person convicted for the murder of Kercher in 2007, but the sentencing report concludes he didn’t act alone. It was released by the highest Italian appeals court, which is considering Guede’s latest appeal.
It’s not the first time the “I was there,” comment has made headlines, suggesting that Knox incriminated herself during that prison conversation. Before Knox’s conviction, her parents said Amanda was referring to Raffaele’s apartment when she was overheard telling them “It would be stupid to lie about this because I know I was there.”
Knox explained the remark in the summer of 2009 when she testified in her murder trial. Knox said that she was at Raffaele’s apartment and wouldn’t lie about it . Asked Tuesday about the newly released judge’s report, a spokesman for the Knox family said “Amanda’s testimony speaks for itself.”
Statement Analysis concludes that Amanda Knox' own words place her at the crime scene and show ownership of involvement.
We have read about prosecutorial misconduct, poor investigatory skills, and lots of unfair treatment by the European press, and in spite of all these things:
Amanda Knox's own words speak for her and tell us what we need to know.
Statement Analysis gets to the truth.
The sentencing report on Guede isn’t all bad news. It says that Guede was not credible and that his stories were “full of inconsistencies,” according to SeattlePI.com. Guede waited five months before placing Knox at the murder scene.
Knox and ex-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito were convicted in December 2009 of sexually assaulting and murdering Kercher in the central Italian city of Perugia. Knox was sentenced to 26 years in prison; Sollecito 25 years. Both deny wrongdoing and their appeals trial is under way.
The next appeal hearing is set for March 12.
Guede opted for a fast track trial, which was closed to the public, and was sentenced to 30 years in prison. His sentence was reduced to 16 years on appeal. He’s appealing again, hoping to have his sentenced shortened further.Source URL: http://ghubar-magazine.blogspot.com/2011/10/amanda-knox.html
Visit ghubar magazine for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
